Frederick Douglas and the Anti-Slavery Movement

When Douglass was eight, he was sent to Baltimore by his causeer to serve as a house retainer to the auld family (Archer 14-17).

His mistress defied state law by training Douglass to boy to read; however, when her husband sight what she was doing, he forbade her to go along to educate him, arguing (with some truth if with disregard for primaeval standards of decency) that education made people unfit for bondage. But Douglass proceed to learn, picking up whatever he could from local schoolboys. When Auld died, Douglass, wherefore 16, was returned to the Maryland plantation to work as a field hand (Ruuth 38).

A few years afterwards he made his first attempt to equivocation, while work in Baltimore as a ship caulker. However, that 1833 attempt was discovered and stopped. In 1939, however, he did manage to escape, fleeing first to New York and then to Massachusetts, where he worked as a manual laborer for terzetto years. His simple tactic of changing his name from Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey to Frederick Douglass helped him to escape the slave hunters who pursued him (Ruuth 40).

One of the most important events in his life - in terms of both its effect on his personally and in terms of the difference that he would demonstrate in American society as a on the whole - occurred

Benson, Mary. Women in Eighteenth-Century America. New York: Kennikat Press, 1966.

As Ruuth (1996) relates the important events of his life, Douglass ran his own antislavery news musical theme from 1847 to 1860 in Rochester, and the reports in this paper were one of the forces that began to convince New Yorkers that ending slavery would claim - and was de military service of - the loss of life.

Although Douglass was certainly an active campaigner clip and again for women's rights, in Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass he argues that obscure men - by virtue of their gender - deserved the certification before women because women were not the leaders of households and societies.

It is both understandable wherefore Douglass should make such an argument - and fundamentally disappointing that a man who had been a slave should not understand at the most profound level the ways in which women were enslaved as well.

in 1841. At an antislavery convention that year, Douglass was invited to speak about his own experiences under slavery - and the eloquence of his words on this do helped secure a leadership position in the abolitionist movement. Few of his new allies had actually expected a former slave to be so naturally argent - for indeed while those in the abolitionist movement believed that slavery was wrong this did not in whatever way think of that they were entirely free of racism, and it is probable that many of them were surprised that any black man could speak so well.

Douglass would continue in public service until 1891, four years before his death, serving as a marshal in the District of Columbia, record-keeper of deeds in the district and minister and consul general to Haiti (Ruut, 1996).

Douglass was frequently jeered when he spoke, and even many of those in the anti-slavery movement doubted whether this articulate gentleman could ever actually have been a slave. The doubts of others, however, ne'er seemed to cause Doug
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.