Biotechnology in its simplest form means using living things to bewilder aroundthing from raw materials. In its earliest form it was not truly controversial. The design of bacteria to make yogurt and cheese, or the use of a special bacterium that kills worms feeding on plants. However, without delay when someone thinks of biotechnology the thought of splicing bran-new genes and creating new organisms comes to mind. The latter is seen as more controversial because it involves human beings entranceway in and changing the communicable code, whereas earlier biotechnology abstruse using organisms in their inherent states to aid in the world or protection of something. Even when a gene-splicing product line might receive the same results as lets say creating a hybrid plant, the gene-splicing job forget always be more controversial with some good deal. And provender of course, since it goes into ones body and is digested creates a great controversy, when it is discovered that perchance the genes of the feed have been modify in a lab, and lets say a growth hormone from a pig has been inserted. In France, in time people seem to react more negatively towards information interchangeable this and in general seem to be oft less accepting to the use of genically special provenders than the people of the United States. Their mis authority of genetically modified foods can be linked to several things which include: a distrust in establishment, lack of knowledge somewhat genetically modified foods, the determine of the modern farm, and a large number of environmental conservationist.
        First, the french have little trust in their presidential termal bureaucracies. And when it comes to food safety, they have very little trust due to the extravasation of mad cow disease, which the cut seem to blame on their government for not dropting in safeguards to protect them against such a horrible disease. This mistake by the French government has caused the people of France to lose trust in the governments ability to determine what is safe (Joly and Lemarie 3). Also, this public outcry has caused the French government to have a moratorium on genetically modified foods, because no elected cancelledicial requisites to lose votes because of support for genetic engineer. This has a negative effect on public percept too, because even though the public does not trust the government to have the publics interests in mind when it comes to safety, they have the general impression that when something is indeed banned it must be sincerely unhealthy.
        An some other contributing factor to the French distrust of genetically engineered foods is that they be not well informed and enlightened on the subject, although this is not only a French problem, it is a contributing factor to their distrust. In France, the secondary schools focus on a liberal arts curriculum and dont teach untold about genetics and technology, leaving the scholar without a great deal of knowledge in the product line of genetics (Dobloff). As a progression of this, most of what is know about genetically modified foods is gained through the media, which tends to only flux stories when there is some sort of controversy involving GM foods. This submit tends to lead the public to believe that all these foods ar dangerous. If perhaps a French person wants to learn about genetic engineering and its danger he/she can prattle a library or bookstore and find books about the topic. This however would be a very proactive post that is not used by many people. In addition, some of the books are written in very scientific foothold or perhaps English, which would dissuade most people from instruction any more information about the topic (Dobloff).
        stock-still another contributing factor to the French publics run acrosss on biotechnology is there cultural view of the Farmer. The French view the modern farm in a much different light than they do the incorrupt farm. They view the classical sodbuster as a conservationist person that really cares for and loves the Earth; this view is almost a romanticized perception of the farmer (Joly and Lemarie 4). It most likely has its foundation in the collectivized ideas of the French, where the in-person farmer is the base of the community, and should be respected. However, the modern farm, which is usually live on by some large corporation, is viewed in an extremely curt light. The modern farm is thought to be run by people that are only concerned with high yields and money. They are thought to be very anti-environment (Joly and Lemarie 4). This thinking also is root in the socialist thinking of the French.
The modern farm is considered to be very capitalists, and that it tries to do anything to make a Euro, even put people at risk. The French associate genetic engineering with modern farming because its new, and funded by large corporations, that are indeed trying to make a profit off of their inventions.
        Last, the French are very environmentally conscious. They, like other countries in Europe, have major political parties that are consecrated solely to saving the environment. They view genetic engineering as harmful to the environment because they believe that it may disrupt the natural order, by introducing plants that are more suited to living a certain way and that they would eventually kill off naturally existing species of plants, thus creating a world full of celluloid plants. The environmentalists do not want man to intervene in nature and end up destroying things that were created naturally over a great length of time, they want the natural world to be conserved in a state that looks like mankind have not touched it.
        In conclusion, there are four main contributing factors the French disapproval of genetically modified foods: distrust of the government, lack of knowledge, cultural views on farmers, and the significant environmental conservationist feelings. The French do not trust their government to protect them against dangerous foods due to past occurrences. They, like many around the globe, do not have decent sources of information about the science behind genetically modified foods, and many receive most of there information from a news that only reports about things going wrong. They have socialist view of the classical farmer that is at the base of society, and the capitalist farmer that tries to gain large profits off of his farm. The French also are very environmentally conscious and view genetic engineering as a threat to the environment.
whole kit and caboodle Cited Doblhoff, O. Educating the European common for Biotechnology. 5 Oct 2001. 21 Apr 2003
Joly, Pierre-Benoit and Stephane Lemarie. Industry Consolidation, Public Attitude, and the Future of Plant Biotechnology in Europe. 1998. 21 Apr 2003.
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment