Econ 234

Growth and In comparabilityThe relationship between issue and neighborly equation has al government agencys intrigued economists and policy-makers . Can one involve economical offset to smooth the social contradictions and to bring closely the desired equality ? Or bequeath it lead to soreness of differences and disagreement crossways polar classes of population ? Different economists get around different answers to these questions . oer the past decades , a number of different theories have emerged that will interpret exploitation in a different way and picture different untrieds reports for it that let in or exclude step-up in disagreementThe economic theory of growth developed by Arthur Lewis relies on the concept of pleonastic trade union movement that will spear-point growth . This theory , unlike a number of others , posits that inequality is a needful component of growth to the point where it facilitates economic proceed . Describing the shift of the population from clownish to urban areas and from low-productiveness to high-productivity areas , Lewis argued that inequality is a necessary prerequisite of growthThe cornerstone of Arthur Lewis growth pattern was eternal supplies of labor and growth under this model , accordingly , was compulsive by a movement of a means of doing (labor ) from a low-productivity firmament to a higher-productivity one (World rim 2006 . Thus , the delivery envisaged by the Lewis model is a duple one that encompasses devil sectors : the industrial and the agricultural one where marginal product is exceedingly low . In contrast , in the industrial sector the marginal product is high which attracts labor to move into this sectorThe conduce is a structural change in which labor overabundance from rural areas migrates to the urban areas wi thout any instal on the productivity of agr! iculture . The immature migrants , settling downhearted in shantytowns and connector the ranks of the city poor , waiting gutter the formal sector has power to absorb them .

This will cipher on how quick profits are reinvested and are commensurate to generate new jobs since they can also be invested in labor obstetrical delivery equipmentIn Lewis perception , inequality is a necessary prerequisite for the propagation of the required savings that can later(prenominal) be reinvested as check of the profits . Investment is a critical growth mover since as it urban rural migration as additional workers in urban areas increase product hence incomes and profit and wasted incomes increase demand for home(prenominal) products while increased profits lineage increased enthronization (Lewis Model - an Overview . Within this circle of adding new workers and reinvesting profits to urinate new jobs , the economy can generate growth at the expense of the highly productive industrial sector . The inevitable result of such growth , save , is increase in rural poverty as few people break to find jobs when they move to the citiesThe model of growth advanced by Lewis contrasted with other models developed by economists . In particular , it offered an explanation of growth different from the one stipulation by Robert Solow in 1956 . This model did not includes a distributional mechanism that would be growth Solow s model instead relied on a production function F (K , L ) which...If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our servi ce, visit our page: write my essay