Sweden and Norway : Represent 2 sides of the Same Coin

Domestic as good as external factors will be analyzed for their sour on political developments in Sweden and Norway. This essay will eldest chart some of the diachronic experiences of these countries and then document the incompatible paths each followed in their development. Finally, contemporary political institutions will be compared and contrasted for indications of how these different countries have produced systems in youthful time that shape up somewhat compatible.

Norway-officially named the " pansydom of Norway"-today has a geographic area of nearly 386,000 form kilometers, slightly larger than the State of New Mexico. As of 1991, it had a cosmos of 4.3 million persons, with an average of 14 residents per square kilometer. It is a heavily Lutheran society. Life expectancy is a healthy 73 old age for men and 80 years for women and the infant mortality localise is exceptionally low. Norway is also a well educated society, possessing virtually a 100% literacy value (U.S. Department of State, 1992a, p. 1).

Norway's economy has a moderate Gross field of study Product (gross national product) of $113 billion in 1991 an annual growth rate of about 2%. But given the small population of the country, Norwegians are considered one of the wealthiest peoples in the world with a per capita GNP of $24,200. Its most valuable natural resources include oil, gas, fish, timber, hydroelectric power, and mineral ores. Even though fishing is a large par

Cooke, P. (1991). European regional cooperation-The perils of partnership. Town & pastoral Planning, 60, pp. 80-83.

The Scandinavian countries, particularly Norway, reach out to live in a political culture that fears "intra-Scandinavian imperialism" (Miljan, 1977, p. 284). Sweden's historic occupation of Norway and, more recently, the trial of Sweden to come to the defense of Denmark and Norway in World War II, continue to be sore points in foreign affairs. The Scandinavian countries cogitate in maintaining significant militaries for their mutual defense, but they do not want to be caught depending on each other for security.

policy-making and constitutional development among the Nordic countries prior to contemporary times can be divided into four major historical epochs. The first major period witnessed the emergence from egalitarianism to monarchy during the Viking era. The s major period was the nitty-gritty of Kalmar, consummated in 1397, at a lower place which three countries were brought together nether a common sovereign. A third era follows the Kalmar Union at about 1500 to 1814, during which Norway was united with Denmark. The fourth major historical epoch went from 1814 to 1905, when Norway and Sweden were joined under a common king (Arneson, 1969, pp. 1920). Prior to the Kalmar Union there had been several instances of significant interrelationships between Norway and Sweden, but the belong three periods left the greatest impact on the modern political development of these countries.

EVOLUTION OF NORWEGIAN AND SWEDISH MONARCHIES

Miljan, T. (1977). The loath Europeans: The attitudes of the Nordic countries toward European integration. London: Croom Helm.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: ordinance Press.

The Riksdag was in eclipse but it never disappeared from the political eyeshot entirely. Charles XI died at the age of 41 and was succeeded by his son, Charles XII. King Charles XII was abus
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.