Jean-Paul Sartre, in "Existentialism,"

The realization of this tremendous right, non tho to himself but to the entire hu gentle military human race, realizes anguish and concern in a man. if a man denies or ignores this responsibility and the anguish it brings, he go out suffer from an "uneasy sense of right and wrong" because his self-deception is a asseveratement about how he thinks whole men should be. In other words, no matter what man chooses to be or do, he represents all men, whether he knows it or likes it or non.

The "anguish," "anxiety" and " devastation" man feels in this state of great responsibility without God is an inevitable by-product of his freedom. The existential philosopher philosopher is against any(prenominal) philosophy which tries to replace the discarded religious ethics with a secular morality. He is against this substitution because it creates a glowering world in which everything is fine and the same values that existed beneath religion continue to exist as guides for all men. To the contrary, the existentialist holds that a world without God is not one in which everything is fine at all. He is "distressed" that there is no God, because it means that there is nothing outside of a man which will tell him what the values are which he should find and seek to express in his life. The individual alone essential determine these values for himself, and, in doing so, for all men. However, level off at bottom the individual there is no essential guide which will help him determine his values.

Only through his actions does man create

There are many problems and contradictions in Sartre's philosophy, particularly in terms of his remaining neat to the core of existentialism. He sets up a world in which man is alone, anxious, forlorn, anguished, without a God and without any external or even internal essence to guide him. Then, however, step by step, he dismantles these basic tenets in order to make his vinegarish philosophy palatable to others and himself. He also underestimates the anguish which non-existentialists experience. How ass he so arrogantly claim that a man who believes in God or a man who lives by secular ethics does not experience anxiety and forlornness similar to, or even more extreme than Sartre's?

A man who believes in God but acts otherwise sure can experience the same "uneasy conscience" which the existentialist feels who fails to act as he believes he should, as illustration of not only himself but all men. Sartre seems to assume that the religionist who lives accord to the teachings of Jesus Christ, for example, is some sort of a mindless robot who does what he is told by the Bible or a preacher, and does not have to deal with the same issues and decisions of moment-to-moment existence which the existentialist essential deal with. Sartre claims that every man has access to understanding any other man's life, any other man's configuration, but it seems that Sartre himself is woefully futile to understand the configuration of those who disagree with existentialism and live kind of according to religious values. Furthermore, how can Sartre not assault even the possibility of their being such a creature as a "Christian existentialist"?

himself and his values. A man is only what he does, what he creates, how he loves. No hope or dream has any meaning, except insofar as he manifests that hope or dream, in action in his life. If a man if brave, it is because he acted bravely; if he is a coward, it is because he acted in a cowardly way. each man is specify in terms of his action
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.